Suggestion: Inactive users will start to see their rating decrease

This will include showing inactive users in the rankings. And we will change a lot more, we will no longer put other topics to a referendum. Let there be some surprises too :) We know what we are doing, we have been doing this for 10 years, we have enough experience. You can't count on positive feedback if the goal is to bring users out of their comfort zone. In order to have a high rating, you have to play at least one game a month. This shouldn't cause too many problems for anyone. The goal is to get more people to engage in mental sports. For example, there are 0 people in the marinating ranking. Any references to earning more money are complete nonsense, we won't even comment on it. Engaging in mental sports is free for us and will remain so, we are currently trying to find motivators so that users start playing less popular games more. PS! The conditions are equal for everyone, no one will be personally harmed by these changes.

if you only have to play one game in a month (I repeat if only 1 game in a month) it would suit me too, I can play one of the 4 kesi perekae, that's a reasonable thing..fartunese's thing was confusing, one thought could be a plus and the other I didn't put a minus at all because I didn't understand the matter....and many didn't understand....the other thing is that we know what we're doing with the makeup, we've been doing it for 10 years of experience. We won't put other topics up for public vote anymore...things are getting worse and worse, nothing is being discussed anymore. What does this show...meikopi, after all, is taking ideas from its sleeve, as if it seems better, nothing is getting better for the users, only worse and meikopi is getting better and better. I think where else can you squeeze in and I'm not surprised at all if the freeroll disappears too..you would win about 60 euros again

It was said out loud :D I read from the text that vint.ee users are stupid and vint.ee management knows better and does as they see fit. Users' opinions are only taken into account if it suits them. If it doesn't suit them, it's not taken into account. There are almost as many opinions as there are users, so you can still find an opinion that suits them and then they claim that you see we took your opinion into account, even though 90% may be against it. They don't even do a poll. At least do a poll.

It's unbelievable how the portal's users-players are treated...a kind of Meikop cult is starting to emerge here :(

... I really don't feel like going through all the posts again in the summer, but the point is, what rating are we talking about!? In a so-called live situation, you still get an official rating by playing in tournaments! And this talk of dropping and discussions should really only be about that. At the moment, Vindis has a combined rating that can really be raised unnaturally high; it could be limited or lowered. Let's still be a site for mind games and think more clearly and broadly. Maybe we should calculate the tournament rating separately (probably not in all game modes) or at least with a second weight in the rating calculation. In most games, your rating really doesn't last more than a year in live, if you don't take part in the corresponding qualifying tournaments, as 1 poster here beautifully explained. 0.5 points a day here is really no loss, if it is considered necessary here and as I understand it, then up to the so-called. starting rating, or 1400. I agree with this option as a compromise, if you don't start counting down before 3-6 months, which may be different in different game modes. Let me give two examples: 1. In chess (checkers), the starting rating is 2000, a person doesn't play for 1 year, by the end of the year their rating drops to 93 points (180 days off) and another 182 points the next year, i.e. after 2 years they only have 1725. 2. The same, but the starting rating is 1600, the rating drops (without playing) to 1400 in 400 180 days. I doubt the need for this, but proportionally it doesn't cause any problems for the players, because earning a couple of hundred points a day with the current system shouldn't be a problem :)

What kind of public? Is 11 a number? You know exactly how many users there are on the site and you dare to criticize like that. There hasn't been any normal discussion or survey. If you have such an experienced and competent board, then what are you criticizing here on the forums? Do it and read the chicks at the end of the year, it seems that this is the only parameter that interests the creators of the site. Secondly, Meikop, look at the votes for and against in your posts, you can digest the so-called public opinion. Customers have an important place in your business, so treat them with dignity.

(Y)

In the "good old days" everything was done without public discussion and everything worked. We need to go back to that. The "Make vint.ee better" forum will remain for user suggestions, the Vint.ee team will continue to develop vint at its discretion.

We also develop at our own discretion :)

So this topic doesn't concern card players, it only concerns mental sports?