Estonia's best card player 2017!
被133名用户阅读
Hello, From the first of September, a two-month competition will start again, where we will determine the best card player in Estonia in 2017! Last year 33 people participated in the competition and the competition was intense until the last days. The rules of the competition are simple: You must play 30 games in four games: Tuhat, Sasku, Bismarck and 4-person perekidnoi (120 games in total) within two months. The games must be played in the game room and with rating calculation! On the first of November, we will add up your ratings in these four games and based on this, a leaderboard. Vint.ee will give away a total of 2000 credits to the best (the winner will essentially get free VIP status for a year) - that's what to compete for! All questions and comments are welcome. Happy card running! Vint.ee Team
good that the competition is happening....the only thing that bothers me is that many people have pushed their accounts to the top...and if you don't have a good rank in saskus then there is no hope for others.in other games everyone plays for themselves...my suggestion is either replace it with some other game or leave this game out altogether,,,,first of all honesty is my priority, I believe that Vindis too. or alternatively start at 1400 again and then everyone will get their ranks back...I remembered meikopi's saying that 2 months is a long enough time that if you are a doer you can get back to the top within 2 months...then there will be more or maybe an eye on it and many will miss out-well yeah I'll just wait for my red clicks then maybe I'll get to 100.but good luck to you...
Even if someone has a high rating in multiple accounts, it is unlikely that those accounts will have a high rating in other games. In this competition, you will be successful if you play with one username and get high ratings in all games. This was also shown by last year's results - the top ten players played with only one account.
Personally, I wouldn't mind if a player who takes part in a tournament agreed to bring their rating to the same level as the other players taking part in the tournament by the start of the tournament. It would be somehow more honest and less controversial :) I have relatively high ratings in all four games at the moment.
[i]posted by kamby[/i] good that the competition is happening .... the only thing that bothers me is that many people have pushed their accounts to the top with sob... and if you don't have a good rating with sob, then there's no hope for others. In other games, everyone plays for themselves... my suggestion is to either replace it with another game or leave this game out altogether,,,, above all, honesty is my priority, I believe so too in Vindis. Or alternatively, start at 1400 again and then everyone will get their raids back... I remembered Meikopi's saying that 2 months is a long enough time that if you're a doer, you can get back to the top within 2 months ... then there's more, maybe you'll keep an eye on it and many will miss out - well, I'll just wait for my red clicks, maybe I'll get to 100. But good luck to you...
who has pushed their rating to the top with sob?
I also support bringing those games where there is competition and everyone who participates to 1400..2 months is a long enough time for those who do it to reach the top again, it's much more fair.
No one in Saskus has ever gotten a rating by cheating - some people just have high ratings with multiple usernames. As for resetting ratings, we discussed this before last year's competition, the competition took place and everyone was happy with the format. When resetting ratings, it's easy to take another username and play with it "from scratch" (while maintaining the high rating of your original user). But we don't want that. We want high-rated players to prove their level once a year and play with that user. Ratings can change a lot in 30 games (especially in Saskus).
Estonia's best card player 2017 - it's a nice and beautiful title, but can the winner of a competition organized under such conditions really be worthy of this title? Having worked as a teacher and a hobby guide during my studies, I dare to say with all seriousness that most elementary school children wouldn't even think of organizing a competition where the final rating is taken into account, but everyone starts at a different level. Some with 1,000 points, some with almost 3,000. How can a person who is engaged in mental sports organize such a competition? Plus these strange justifications and the statement that everything has to be exactly like that. Maybe we'll take Meikop's example and start organizing tournaments and competitions like this in real life? In checkers and chess, we give international grandmasters a certain amount of points in advance, but we take them away from the candidate for champion. You could also run a marathon based on previous results, some start an hour later, no problem. Thanks, kamby and Ken112, for drawing attention to the problem. It's a shame that those smart and insightful people who know Meikop in person are silent. I can't help but remember a parable about a king who was naked, but only one little boy out of a large crowd dared to admit it out loud.
Rating melts in 30 games like cold snow in hot piss
Rose Estonian chess tournaments currently use these ratings http://www.maleliit.ee/reitingud/index.php?akt=10-1 and international tournaments use FIDE ratings, which you can search for here http://www.maleliit.ee/reitingud/index.php?akt=10-1 In the history of chess, no one has come up with the idea of giving everyone a rating of 0 or, for example, 1400 and organizing a Swiss system of drawing pairs by first names or last names (based on the alphabet)