Tournament pocket movements

被63名用户阅读

gauss 2016-02-07T22:17:34+02:00
If the tournament had 13 tables, 52 people, then the last 10 rounds I played at one table with the same person. On the one hand, it is correct to place players at tables according to the current results. On the other hand, in such a large hall, one should be able to play against more opponents. Moreover, in the case of duplicated hands, the result is compared with the results obtained with the same cards at other tables. So I play against the entire hall anyway, regardless of who my direct opponents are at the table. Therefore, direct opponents at the table could rotate if possible. Creating good movement schemes (especially in individual competitions) is probably difficult, but the current placement with positions can definitely be improved.
Mets58 2016-02-07T23:02:20+02:00
The positions are good, but Gauss did a bad job - he let the time go to zero in a losing situation and got a lot of points :)
tommy42 2016-02-21T03:31:57+02:00
To avoid such 'scoundrels', a tournament should be awarded a score for overtime when losing, with the worst result of that hand being recorded. Of course, we must not forget the exceptional case where _all_ games end in overtime ;)

发表回复

这个功能只针对已验证的或VIP用户