Sasku is a fink.

When will the offer be finalized? Get your hands dirty! Why isn't it there yet?

Oh, one more thing, why do I have to wait for my turn to shout to make a square right away? With that, you could at least block your opponents from giving a picture! In a real game, you can make a square at any time. Personally, I have wanted to make a trump many times but I can't!!!!!!!! After that, I have no interest or desire! Why was the offer shown instead of the story. The text has disappeared from there? I think this change in giving a picture can wait, it's so insignificant. Do more of it then. Otherwise, you'll soon start making another change. I think there are still changes that could be made. The biggest mess of all was the scoring in the tournament. That has nothing to do with reality. But good luck for the future and I hope that tomorrow will still be the old way!

In the real game, there are many different variations, for example, if a partner gave me a picture, in Setumaa I didn't have to give him a suit in return, but I could give him a picture in return (even a king of clubs), and the game was much more exciting.

Juhoman eagerly demonstrates his ignorance in several aspects. He has probably never been to the Estonian Sasku Championship in his life and does not know what the official bidding rules are.

The tournament system is probably a little difficult for the average person to understand. But don't worry - it was invented by much smarter people.

Mets, can't you give a picture back now? I haven't tried it myself - it shouldn't be forbidden! The so-called blind square wouldn't be worth promoting very much - then we'll soon be at the level that trump is made without seeing the cards first and in fact we should still take into account various "lags" here. The logical thing is that the next player after the dealer makes his 1st move, be it . for example a square trump or any other legal action, then the next hand decides what he does, etc. The fact that the dealer's back hand, who still has a great internet connection, shouldn't get the right to make a square right away - too many squares are made here anyway! The reason is simple. It's possible to get more points from there, but also lose! The so-called emergency square is intended to protect against the hairy one, not to interfere with the giving of a picture. Of course, this could be considered, whether the picture could be given before it's your turn to act. Live, of course, is played in all sorts of ways, but in this matter, it shouldn't be the case that whoever gets to shout first has the right - it's not appropriate for a bird, at least not in official tournaments!

bog if you have the king of clubs as the only picture in your hand and a lot of diamonds and a suit to beat, do you always give that king to the partner, I don't, because if my diamond trump is the chance to capture the opponent's king may be lost, for example if my partner makes the opening move and the opponent's only king happens to be in my backhand

The program no longer asks the owner of a single image if they want to give it away. I think this is a big mess. What do you think?

The current update ruins the beauty and charm of the game, and I think the box that asks the owner of a single picture whether they want to give the picture to a partner or not should be restored. If you agree, then vote for it.

I myself am a true card gamer and even with 1 picture, several small squares and a thin ace, I can easily make a square a trump and play the game as a whole. If you take away the only picture, then the game loses a lot of its character and color. Sometimes you have to take risks too!!! It's still largely a question of your own perception, whether you dare or not to make a trump.

Those who play for 90 or more points and fail to make a trump card should be punished instead!!! This is a place to think about what to do...whether to change the rules or something....we have discussed this at length with rigoletto.