Very good, thoughts are gathering. Next suggestion: 1) The competition will take place between 01.02.2016 - 31.03.2016 2) We will add up the winning coefficients of the three games (number of wins divided by the number of games played). Or we will take the average of the three games. 3) Users who have played 50 games in each game during these two months will be taken into account. That would make an average of 3 games per day, which is not too many?
Estonia's best card player 2016
Läst av 318 användare
The time period is a good idea. Users who have played 50 games in each game during those two months are counted. Also a good idea. Wins, second and third place could be counted. (2, 1 and 0 points respectively). Proposal. The first 50 games are counted, so are the thousandths, etc.
Well, I'm starting to like it WHY? IT SEEMS TO BE THE MOST FAIR OPTION SO FAR AND IT IS ALSO MADE FOR THOSE WHO HAVE TO WORK, ETC... GOOD LUCK
and games played to completion count
This is suspicious, then a situation arises where if you don't win you start losing and then oh sorry, I can suddenly play 300 games but only finish 20, for example. I would also support this because I'm pretty bad at it, but it doesn't justify itself.
[i]posted by Liidia[/i] and games played to the end will count
And if you start losing, then it's a "poor internet connection" :) I haven't seen a reasonable proposal to find out the best so far. All kinds of ratings, odds, etc. eventually cause a lot of complaints about "intentional losses and other manipulations". I recommend organizing a tournament where the winners advance and the losers are eliminated. At the end there is a grande finale.
but try to find a time that suits everyone, then it's still a mess that I couldn't participate because I had to be at work, etc. It certainly wouldn't be suitable for a week's shift, who goes to the countryside, who goes to the pit, etc. Sometimes even free roles are canceled at the week's shift because there are no participants.
A good tactic is to take 1 minute to move and consider each move thoroughly (59 sec)
[i]posted by fermat[/i] All sorts of ratings, odds, etc. eventually lead to a lot of accusations about "intentional losses and other manipulations".
We thoroughly analyze the games of users who have reached the prize places. This is easy for us to do (for example, based on mine): 4-person family kidnoi Bismarck Tuhat
It's easier that there are no 2nd place points because the 3 games we're talking about are still about winning. Winning and losing are no different, making it easier for both the players and the so-called matches.