Nail Inspection and Re-Inspection
122 kullanıcı tarafından okundu
I find that both of these functionalities do not add anything to this game: When watching, there are two options: 1) The spectator sees both players' cards - this significantly increases the risk that the spectator will help one of the players. 2) The spectator does not see either player's cards - is there anything to watch in this case? I don't see the point of watching again, because this game is not comparable in complexity to other board games (there are no beautiful combinations, etc.). What are the opinions of others?
I don't think it makes sense to implement spectating. Rather, the game could be made more interesting by adding a multiplayer version where more than 2 people could play at the same time. I think 6 people at one table would be enough. Do you think it's feasible?
[i]posted by a bachelor[/i] I think that there is no point in implementing spectating. Rather, the game could be made more interesting by adding a multiplayer version where more than 2 people could play at the same time. I think 6 people at one table would be enough. Do you think it is feasible?
[u] I am in favor of it [/u]
It doesn't make sense to watch from the sidelines, I support the idea that more than 2 people can play at the same time
I still think that there could just be more than 2 players and the punches could be distributed in a different way - not that you pick a weak one and you constantly stomp on him and then you get to the punches... but you don't even bother messing with each other, after all, it's always a career ladder! But if you give the punches for show with the remaining cards counted and the win combined - let's say you win 10 and the opponent's cards are rÄ-11 pK-4 r9-9 : total-24 for the user.... but when it comes to peeking, there's only one point here - you just go and talk a little more privately and the whole story - no problem!!
It would be nice to make a multiplayer version of this, or you could make it so that the spectator sees one person's cards and the computer decides which one, and you can't switch sides (that should be a bit safer)
[i]posted by peeterarthur[/i] It would be right to make a multiplayer version of this, or you could instead make it so that the spectator sees one person's cards and the computer decides which one, and you can't switch sides (that should be a bit safer)
If one of the players is your friend, there is a risk that you will tell him your cards in advance.