Around the world

Leído po 95 usuarios

Mask 2012-05-12T00:45:59+03:00
Journey to infinity. A continuation of the UFO theme. All you can look for are different forms of energy existence. Energy is becoming increasingly complex and its study is therefore vitally important. If you want to go to the supposed infinity, then the furthest known fixable object is a vacuum of -273 degrees. A photon is radiation that can also be a wave and has its own frequency. It can be electromagnetic radiation and also a cold emitter. It can come from one or more directions and in several different types. The argument is like this. One direction of the photon could be from a -273 degree anti-star and is a form of energy that has escaped from there. It is cold because nothing else can get out of there and the original photon could be the radiation of a cold wave. Such a thing has been described as the evaporation of a black hole. I then argue that a positive particle falls into the anti-star and a negative photon is emitted. (You can imagine a rotating disk in a super-cold environment, from which massless particles move away.) Another reason why they separate is the decay of matter in the antistar ring. This antistar creates a universal vacuum and emptiness, with its own mass. Due to such a range of influence, it is the center of the imaginary universe for us and also absolute zero. Such an antistar could explain the movement of galaxies and the emptiness and vacuum of the intermediate areas. To be precise, the antistar is shaped like a ring. The theory of the antistar would explain a relatively large area around us. Assumptions about the birth of matter particles lead thoughts to the heart of the antistar. What is happening there, the decay of matter? (Perhaps it is under such conditions that the first particle of energy is created. That is, in the center of the vacuum. The vacuum pulls the particle from within itself. In a vortex, no matter how big. Whatever it is, it is possible to take it.) So the search for the smallest particle instead led to the largest. And it turned out that the vacuum was before, an energy particle. The photon is the Energy Carrier, away from the antistar, to form a new beginning there. It moves away from the antistar from the Equator - as a photon, while a mass of atoms and electrons is emitted from the poles. We know nothing about this material. Perhaps the antistar breaks the atoms back to a large extent into a primitive hydrogen atom. After great friction, in a circle and later as several thin jets at the speed of light, falling to the center and exiting from the poles along the lines of force. It is not visible, because the mass is too sparse. If we claim that the black hole is the little brother of the antistar, then we are - in the photon region. In this respect, we see the equator of the black hole. Fixing the emission of radiation and its origin, the movement of the mass in between makes it difficult. Moreover, it seems that the positive material that has exited from the poles moves in an arc to the sides of the galaxy to form new stars there. Therefore, if a positive mass of atoms comes out of the poles of the black hole and a negative mass of photons comes out of the equator, then these energies merge at the edges of the galaxy, and the same probably happens with the antistar on a larger scale, which forms Galaxies. The galaxy also collects enough atoms to the outskirts, moving at 0.002 the speed of light. If such a circulation and antistar turn out to be true, then the scales of the universe, the concept of the big bang and time will become enormously larger. The amount of energy and matter will increase by an incredible amount. The formation of the sun at the edge of the galaxy due to the explosion of the star there will also change a little. The circulation of energy is perfectly guaranteed and in principle eternal. The distance of the Milky Way from the antistar could be 13 billion years, referring to the background velocity. And the universe is oval because we are located in the disk of the antistar. In the width direction of the disk, distant galaxies can be seen, but in the thickness direction, the field of view ends in emptiness. It should be a good theorist and explain a lot of things. Also in relation to the age of galaxies within our range and ours. In relation to photons and black holes. And also in relation to the large proportion of hydrogen in the sun, because if the solar system was formed from the exploded cloud of another star, then the proportion of hydrogen would be much lower than 73%, which probably burned up on the other star. As a small model, the sun, compared to the galaxy. The solar wind is also a radiation of photons and it is certainly greater at the equator, due to rotation, but it is a different kind of energy, but it is still stored in the outskirts of the solar system. In the meteorites there. If a good number of hydrogen molecules and electrons were added to them, the accumulation of planets would be relatively rapid and the increase in mass and density would probably bring them closer to the sun. Or it would increase the danger of meteorites to the world. The solar system could easily end up passing through a material-rich environment (or dark matter) and the cloud of dust would accept it kindly. The main weakness of this theory is that it is not known what the composition of the mass coming out of the poles of the black hole could be. Is it large, electrons and hydrogen atoms? The idea is that if the antistar exists, then the big bang can be pushed back very far into the past and the history of the Milky Way began from the extreme areas of the antistar, 13 billion years ago and the galaxies that follow us are younger. Most of the inner stars of the Milky Way should also be older than the sun. Although the speed of movement towards the black hole can be at different speeds. Moreover, this theory would explain the composition of dark matter, which could be clouds of material from which galaxies have not formed, i.e. clouds of matter that have left the antistar or are moving back towards it. And the antistar itself can be an influence on dark matter. The owner of the background radiation can be other black holes besides the antistar. Because a huge rotating disk in space that is not full of matter, but with gaps. should be very cold. Especially the size of an antistar. In other words, a star torn apart cools down quickly. Why does the previous theory concern us? Spatial expansion may be an illusion in the current sense, because it is mainly based on the big bang theory. If an antistar exists, then everything takes on a different form, but the expansion of matter does occur for other reasons. Namely, matter is constantly under a triple fire of photons. First, background radiation coming from an antistar. Second, from a black hole, and third, from the sun. The meeting of matter particles with a photon excites it. Transfers energy. The direct consequence of this is an increase in mass. At least until it itself starts to radiate in larger quantities. There is a relatively safe feeling in the world, but is there really enough? There are many reasons to worry. First, what directly affects us. For example, what could have been the reason for the increase in the size of dinosaurs and what could have been the weak point of their last moment of life (size). It probably makes no sense to mention the obvious growth of humans in the last 1000 years. Using this comparison, humans would be twice as large in 4000 years. This is very slow and exhausting. So a person would already need a little photon shelter, especially during solar eclipses. What if a sunspot half the size of the sun appears. Second, photons grow a meteorite cloud. On the outskirts of the solar system. Growing danger. Third, the mass of our planet increases. The increase in mass can affect the stability of the orbit. Fourth, the mass of the entire solar system increases. Affecting the orbit around the black hole. Perhaps, gradually, the stars will slide towards the black hole. Which leaves humanity with only one choice. Become mobile between the stars or accept the fate of the dinosaurs. And moving from star to star may not be enough in the end. Considering the existence of an antistar. There is no immediate reason for direct concern, and also for several generations, but thinking further, the increase in danger is obvious. How close can the solar system get to a black hole. The last reason is also without an antistar. It seems that there is reason to familiarize yourself with the topic a little. It is difficult to believe in a stargate, because due to the circulation of matter, nothing permanent exists in the universe. Except for an anti-star. Although a black hole has been considered a stargate, to some extent it is. Due to the outflow of positive particles from the poles, which would provide a theoretical take-off acceleration. In fact, we do not know what happens to a body moving at the speed of light when it is freed from the collection of electrons, directing it in the opposite direction. 75% of the speed of light. In essence, reactive acceleration should occur even at the speed of light. It is simply that no body moving at the speed of light does this and cannot be influenced by it. Therefore, what is needed for the eternal existence of humanity. A super-economical energy source. (in the best case, a perpetual motion machine), one of which is based on the conversion of photon energy into electrons or some other type of energy. Electrons for electricity and mass, which can also be rocket fuel. The production of oxygen and water (from the universe) or the possibility of reproduction. Of course, a competent means of transport that can do this and protect against photons. Finally, a guided research and communication base consisting of electrons, which is the most difficult. Protection from photons. Traveling between stars will extend the lifespan of humanity. In the long run, these goals may be feasible. Let's assume that all of this is true. If UFOs more advanced than us exist, they will move along the star chain away from the black hole. There are probably free stars on the outskirts of the galaxy and also less photon radiation. :) The theory covers such a large area that it is very far from being thorough. What do you think, are the goals of this theory worth the effort and effort if it is true. Verification is not very difficult. It provides inspiration. Five days ago, this theory did not exist and perhaps would never have arisen if we were not the way we are. I chose the directions of my efforts to find some inventions and answers to big questions. Maybe some other side was offended by this, but I considered it important to find a probable solution and purpose. We all throw our pebbles into the stream of time and this is one of my pebbles and means a little more to me than a forum topic. I present it, being one of the authors! The theory seems good to me and could be developed properly! Because it concerns us all. And it fits the world and some sections.
Rose 2012-05-12T09:56:55+03:00
[i]posted by Mask[/i] The main weak point of this theorist is... Moreover, this theorist would explain the content of the dark matter composition... Why does the previous theorist concern us? Theorist covers such a large area that it is very far from being thorough. What do you think, are the goals of this theorist worth the effort and effort... Five days ago this theorist did not exist... Theorist seems good at least and could be developed properly!
Mask, please forgive me, but this "theorist" is still painful to read, especially in this volume. When you pronounce this word yourself, do you really hear the letter "j" instead of "i"? In Estonian, the word "theory" is!
Mask 2012-05-12T11:25:11+03:00
Thanks for correcting. A really bad mistake. From absent-mindedness. Besides, the text has a rather deep meaning and you are so involved in conveying that thought that it happens and the correctness of the text may suffer if you pay attention. The text is quite long and you don't pay attention to everything. Sometimes it happens that you write once and the rest comes automatically. If possible, I will correct it.
reede13 2012-05-12T14:29:01+03:00
http://novaator.ee/ET/kusi_teadlaselt/forumid=2/post=171/
Mask 2012-05-12T14:36:54+03:00
Same author :)
Ruut 2012-05-12T18:59:06+03:00
So Mask....you claim that the void was there before and energy was born from some particles,,,it is possible that energy really started from that, but where it all started is still not clear, you interpret it as a certain stage of its development, but it does not lead to the truth. How did the void become a vacuum, which causes the temperature -270 If there is something else at the same time as the void that would affect the void, we could discuss it further, but the void alone is not enough for any development to take place at all.
Mask 2012-05-12T20:56:47+03:00
Exactly. For reasons beyond my control, everything turned out to be much larger, leaving a lot of new things to digest. However, the answer is not owed. It is essentially written. And you are not right that it does not lead further. All possibilities are open and visible. A vortex had to arise, which caused cold and vacuum. But cold is radiation, or energy. With a transmitted photon. An antistar causes -270 degrees. So practically everything has been said. Scientists know what caused this vortex and believers do too. So this should be a satisfactory start for everything and everyone.
Mask 2012-05-12T21:07:25+03:00
One way a vortex can form is through currents, but the very first vortex was created by something else. There were no currents back then.
Hob 2012-05-12T22:17:13+03:00
The current situation is that the void, which is unknown to us, is endless and if there is no beginning, then there is no end. And if you find the beginning and the end, then a new sequence begins from the beginning. Thinking in three dimensions, the discussion will not get anywhere. Moving on to higher levels, then the matter already has a complexion. All things have a cause. At the beginning of the void, there is an unchanging cause, eternal, before the void. It is possible that then we will also partake of the source of life, power and consciousness. Maybe then someone will also have the idea of safer energy sources that do not burn fuel and overcome gravity and a base that can travel underwater, in the air and in outer space. Maybe Musk will get inspired and complete an intact theory.
Mask 2012-05-13T08:58:25+03:00
Good thread. I see a burst of inspiration. The beginning and the intermediate solid stage provide a strong support base. At the moment, however, the only one who is relatively indifferent to gravitation and matter, while fixing neutrinos is relatively difficult. But the goal is interesting. It requires an awful lot of work. And I believe that imagination and logic could eventually find some solution. When all matter particles and gravitational force fields and not yet existing shadows, compatibility opposites have been checked. UFOs exist! :) However, underwater, the conditions are too different. Gradually.

Respuesta al mensaje

Esta funcionalidad es sólo para usuarios verificados o VIP