Bismarck more perfect
Lu par 178 utilisateurs
It would be a suggestion that Bismarck could also have the option to play a full game, i.e. the existing variant should be supplemented with stacking from ace to six and free choice. I call on the progressive community around the world to support this proposal.
[i]posted by bazooka[/i] It would be a suggestion that in Bismarck there could be an option to play a full game, i.e. the existing variant should be supplemented with stacking from ace to six and free choice. I call on the progressive community of the entire world to support this proposal.
The proposal is good.
I agree with the previous opinions.
The game is going to be relatively long.. although I'm still in favor.. so are there two options? That you can choose between a shorter and a longer one.. sometimes you don't know if you'll have time to play to the end.
I would also like to have an ace to six stack. Otherwise, this game is incomplete.
[i]posted by Nurme[/i] I would also like a stack from ace to six. Otherwise, this game seems incomplete.
This original variant has been requested from Meikop for a long time, Tuhat and Sasku have come in the meantime, but Bismarck has remained as it is, although there have been grumblings on this topic before, that the game is incomplete and that three forced stacks often decide the outcome of the game, but we hope that maybe a normal variant of this game type will be set up for playing. Let's give Meikop time to set up the atra :)
[i]posted by liina87[/i] The game is going to be relatively long.. although I'm still in favor of it.. so are there two options? That you can choose between a shorter and a longer one.. sometimes you don't know if you'll have time to play to the end.
Sometimes a thousand is going to be many times longer and no one will stop playing, there are interrupters in all game types, you have to take that into account anyway. And both BISM options could exist, although I would prefer the original option.
Some tournaments can go so that no one ever makes a trump card and you can't choose the layout yourself, so there are too many (or too few) positions. A somewhat arbitrary comparison, but no one would want to play 85% black in a checkers tournament. The table drawing program could have an additional criterion of the number of times the player has played in the same position (table position number). It doesn't have to be "down" because of that, but the current system, for example, can make the top three play in the same positions until the end if no one "falls out" from there. The criterion should at least take into account the number of previously played positions among the top three and try to equalize it.
[i]posted by rabapalm[/i] Some tournaments can go so that you never make a trump card and you can't choose the layout yourself, so one position is too much (or too little). A bit of an arbitrary comparison, but no one would want to play 85% black in a checkers tournament. The board drawing program could have an additional criterion of the number of plays in the same position (board position number). You don't have to play "downwards" because of that, but the current system, for example, can make the top three play in the same positions until the end if no one "falls out" from there. The criterion should at least take into account the number of previously played positions among the top three and try to equalize it.
Why doesn't Meikop discuss this topic?
[i]posted by bazooka[/i] It would be a suggestion that in Bismarck there could also be an option to play a full game, i.e. the existing variant should be supplemented with stacking from ace to six and free choice. I call on the progressive community of the whole world to support this proposal.
Meikop, when will the original Bismarck version of Vint be released?