Around the world

,,,,,but the mask that created the anti-star? Do you want to claim that anti-matter existed before the material world we know? And if that was the case, what could have caused it. Of course, you are good at posting so much material on the forum, but the answers still give me little evidence,,,,where it all started is still a mystery. It takes a lot of energy to create a vacuum, but did a vacuum also exist in the anti-world, or was it superpressure?

Maybe an interesting article will have a good effect on the visitorship of the bird. The fact that its name is Antistar does not mean that it is antimatter. It is simply a rather old vortex. If you remove all the staff from its area of influence, then there is a vacuum there and it does that. There is no point in doubting its capabilities. 380,000 light years of material and power, side view, with a picture! A quarter of it remains in our perceptible, optical field of view. It simply cannot hold on to the existence of matter!!! Moreover, it produces more of itself. There is no doubt in a black hole. Simply put: There is no doubt in the sun. You go outside. You feel warm. Come night, you feel cold, the antistar is shining! :) Evidence that directly concerns you. As I mentioned. A person believes what he sees and feels. There was no talk of overpressure. They are in the heart of the planet and at the bottom of the sea. Calculating the age of the antistar will be quite difficult.

In this case, it remains unclear why this so-called giant vortex is called an anti-star. The word anti means opposite. But still, where could it all have started,,,in a void that is not measurable? If there was only a void, from which such a low temperature has arisen?

If we exclude the unchanging cause of the beginning of emptiness, which is eternal (the source of life, power (energy), and knowledge), then it may seem that it (i.e. the infinite emptiness) eats itself, so to speak, from the other end (around), although this cannot be correctly expressed in this three-dimensional vision of the world. As a result of eating, vortex(s), vacuum(s), etc. occur. thereby producing itself again...

Hardly believable,,,,if there is no beginning or end, how is this so-called eating possible?

The initial accumulation of energy and eating, so to speak, are two independent processes. There is a beginning and a circulation. There is the creation of matter. There are more reasons to prove this. But I believe that it is not right to go into great detail in the forum. Many people have worked very hard to get this proof this far. I am the only one who calls it an anti-star, because it is incredibly cold. I also believe that someday a visual simulation of all this can be seen, if I am allowed to do so and find the means. What do you think, would it be nice to see the beginning of the universe? But maybe someone else will do it too. There is quite a lot of description. Anyway, I have a picture of it, which is really real (provable). Of course, it also provides a lot of science fiction inspiration, which the wire especially likes :)

Mask, how can you have an idea of this if you don't know what caused the beginning, what processes were triggered and what. this so-called anti-star or cold vortex, what caused it? It is still not clearly understood, but where did it all start and I think it will remain a mystery. I once asked Bible scholars for their version, but they claimed that if a person knew this, then he would no longer be a person and therefore a person does not need to know this. It seems that you do not understand what infinity, infinite emptiness, means. This term itself actually gives the answer, that this question is unsolvable. But good luck to you, you are moving somewhere towards infinity with your discussion. If you want to go crazy, the best way is to turn your gaze to the sky and let your mind move into an unknown distance!!!

The beginning was caused by the source of life, power, and knowledge. See also previous posts on the thread. ps there is no effect without a cause, find the basis for it and the answer is here. you have to see more broadly, so that matter does not blind you. you will reach the eternal and unchanging cause - life, power (energy) and knowledge. If you are looking for new types of energy, then always look for what you can use simultaneously on land, in the air, underwater and in outer space. (does not burn fuel is the keyword)

In a way, I agree. The infinite void has no explanation, and this answer is not in my orbit of interest, because the infinite void from a certain distance does not affect us in any way. But since it is a void, there is nothing interesting in it. Interesting answers are those that affect us. There was once also the infinity of the land beyond the sea. There is no point in worrying that I am moving into infinity. So I was interested in the farthest point and its existence and the reasons for its emergence, which is therefore a legitimate interest, because it affects us. Until then, we have the right to look. Just as we have the right to look with respect and faith towards a person who knows all the answers. I stopped at that point and there is no reason to go further. So if I had a vision, some kind of part of the creation of the universe, then it may not have been my own desire. Perhaps it had a purpose that we do not yet know. Everyone who looks at the sky may have a different purpose. We also look there when we have a wish, a prayer, a hope, or simply to contemplate the grandeur of the work that has been done. Who sees what and how it affects whom?

Interesting article again, although a bit long to read on the fly. I wonder if Musk is a scientist or a professor or a theorist or something like that to be so dedicated to this?