[i]posted by fantunes[/i] Another idea is that the "taking away" of points does not necessarily have to be equal for all users on an absolute scale, perhaps a relative scale is fairer. For example, a rating of 3000 takes 1 point per day, but a rating of 1500 takes 0.5 points per day (or in reality 1 point over 2 days, since a rating with decimal places is not needed (not that there is anything wrong with that)). For example, if we choose 1 point per day as the algorithm from the 30th day of inactivity, then with a half-year break in play, the loss would be about 150 points. This can be made up for with just 4 won games, so this "robbing" of points is probably not as unfair as it seems at first glance.
Can anyone explain the idea of this system, why the countdown is needed? At the moment, it seems like panic is being sown again. Suggestion: Inactive users will start to see their rating decrease
Läst av 184 användare
of course I don't see it because I've been a VIP. Now the summer has started, if you're not a VIP, you won't get the next 2 weeks either. Right now I can play, I'm on sick leave. I'll repeat again if I have credit on my account, no one can take it away from me, if I have a raid, no one has the right to take it away from me... then the games will lose all their essence and principle. Manipulating other people's accounts is prohibited... it doesn't matter what account it is... I don't know the law... I'll put or make a page to advertise the guy so badly. I won't do any advertising, thank you or give it. I'll tell you the truth. Maybe it will bring new people to the guy..... Of course I'll leave myself because then it won't be interesting anymore and the thing will lose its meaning
Quite an interesting read for you here. The fact that ratings are not eternal should be quite natural. Most sports where ratings are used have much crueler rating rules than the ones that are being tried to be implemented here. The usual thing is a rating table that, for example, takes into account the results of the current period of time. In tennis, for example, it is a year, in volleyball a longer period, with older results being taken into account in a smaller proportion. Freezing ratings of any kind is actually evil - and there is a close, stupid example from real chess that we can take from us: Iivo Neil, as an unknown beginner, managed to win a few tournaments around 1970 and played very little afterwards, especially avoiding domestic competitions, because he knew that this would lower his rating. And so he bragged about his ten years and bragged about his rating - playing the minimum required number of games (from which ELO was calculated) That the question here is simply whether you want to play here or do you want some fancy number behind your name that will make you feel like you're going crazy at home. But some of the insults and claims are seriously funny, which even make the site creator recommend: - well, if the rating number seems low, put three zeros on it; - make sure you don't start giving away money or anything material for playing - then you'll get a serious criminal charge for causing addiction and forcing people to play
Yes, gaming skills fade over time, so should your rating. If you don't play for half a year, your rating number will no longer be adequate. At the same time, the "Vint.ee best players" box in the game room will also appear, where the leader of the rating table for all games is clearly visible. Currently, you need to make 5 clicks to see who is, for example, the best 4-row player, etc.
[i]posted by MrQb[/i] Quite an interesting read here. The fact that ratings are not eternal should be quite natural. Most sports where ratings are used have much crueler rating rules than the ones that are being tried to be implemented here. The usual thing is a rating table, which, for example, takes into account the results of the current period of time. In tennis, for example, it is a year, in volleyball a longer period, with older results being taken into account with a smaller proportion. Freezing ratings of any kind is actually evil - and there is a close, stupid example from real chess that we can take from us: Iivo Neil, as an unknown beginner, managed to win a few tournaments around 1970 and played very little afterwards, especially avoiding domestic competitions, because he knew that this would lower his rating. And so he bragged about his ten years and bragged about his rating - playing the minimum required number of games (from which ELO was calculated). That the question here is simply whether you want to play here or if you want some fancy number behind your name that makes you feel like you're going to burst out laughing at home. But some of the insults and claims are seriously funny, which even make the site creator recommend: - well, if the rating number seems low, put three zeros on it; - make sure you don't start giving away money or anything material for playing - then you'll get a serious criminal charge for causing addiction and forcing people to play
Logical, if you play, the rating changes, and the game also changes, we're talking about those who don't play for some reason. It would be enough if this user stayed somewhere in the shadows like it works now. What's the point of lowering the rating just like that???
After all, Meikop has some kind of cunning plan - maybe he wants to earn more money :)
[i]posted by Mets58[/i] Meikop has some kind of cunning plan - maybe he wants to make more money :)
Read the first post. But it seems that the solution proposed by Fantunes suits many, so let's take the plan.
and there is no other reason than that if you don't play, your skills are likely to decline. And the rating should show your CURRENT level. If you haven't played, why should you have a rating from 2 years ago that remains like amen in church? If you are just as good, then compete for that rating. To reiterate, the rating is an indicator of the athlete's CURRENT strength. The question also arises as to why these rating holders don't play? Fatal illnesses such as 3 months in bed should be quite rare - and believe me, such illnesses are also reflected in playing ability. Another option would be to simply reset a non-playing person to zero. You can't create some kind of ranking of dead souls. What would be the point of that? As with any sport, if you want your rating to remain the same, you have to compete. It's so logical that I really can't understand the logic, but why does my rating just drop? But maybe Meikop will also make some kind of eternal ranking - let's say a record ratings table - would that be comforting?
[i]posted by MrQb[/i] and there is no other reason than that if you don't play, your skills are likely to decline. And the rating should show your CURRENT level. If you haven't played, why should you have a rating from 2 years ago that remains like amen in church? If you are just as good, then compete for that rating. To reiterate, the rating is an indicator of the athlete's CURRENT strength. The question also arises as to why these rating holders don't play? Fatal illnesses such as 3 months in bed should be quite rare - and believe me, such illnesses are also reflected in playing ability. Another option would be to simply reset the non-playing person to zero. You can't create some kind of dead souls ranking. What would be the point of that? As with any sport, if you want your rating to remain the same, you have to compete. It's so logical that I really can't understand the logic, but why does my rating just drop? But maybe Meikop will also make some kind of eternal ranking - let's say a record ratings table - would that be comforting?
ok, such a reasoning is explanatory, indeed the rating shows some strength or playing skill, but in this case it should apply in the next so-called period when the ratings are calculated, e.g. once a year.
[i]posted by MrQb[/i] - make sure you don't start giving away money or anything material for playing - then you'll get a serious criminal charge for causing addiction and forcing people to play
I was just thinking that we could give the leader of the leaderboard one credit every day or something like that :D And that's just in the areas of mind sports - maybe it will motivate someone to play more Stack 4D or Pickle.