Rules of the Nail Game

被176名用户阅读

MeikopVint.ee创建者 2009-01-22T11:41:34+02:00
It turns out that different people have different ideas about the rules of this game. The points of contention are as follows: 1) Is a move mandatory? There are two options: Yes or no:) According to the current rules of Vind, you have to move if you can. 2) Taking a card from the ground. There is currently a version implemented where you have to take a card from the ground (and you can only take one!), if you can't move. I also heard opinions that the game is played in such a way that you can take a card from the ground even if you can move. You take it just in case, maybe something good will come. Does anyone have any opinions / memories (how this game was played in childhood:))?
Lilleke5 2009-01-22T21:06:40+02:00
Personally, I would like it the way the rules currently state it. If you do it differently, it would be like porridge and cabbages and nothing would come of the so-called strategy. :) And so much from memory: I have played that 6 gives 2 up and 7 gives 3 up. The rest is the same.
Lilleke5 2009-01-22T22:19:01+02:00
I have to take back my words. The current rules still don't work. There should be non-binding attendance.
jaanusVint.ee创建者 2009-01-23T11:29:54+02:00
In Uno, for example, going is not mandatory. You can also voluntarily take one more card. To confuse your opponents, for example? And I've also played this game so that 6 gives 2 cards and 7 gives a third card and I haven't used this four-card option before.
MeikopVint.ee创建者 2009-01-23T12:59:15+02:00
So. now we should do an analysis: We put a button next to the cards "Take a card from the ground". The button can be pressed once during your turn. In addition, we need to make another button: "Abandon move", which can be pressed during your turn. Is it a draw if both players abandon their move in a row?
jaanusVint.ee创建者 2009-01-24T12:49:59+02:00
I haven't heard/seen anything about giving up a move. If you don't want to move, you just take a card from the ground. Then it should be enough to have one button: "Take a card from the ground", which gives the turn to the other player. Or what?
MeikopVint.ee创建者 2009-01-24T13:59:02+02:00
[i]posted by jaanus[/i] I haven't heard/seen the thing about giving up a move. If you don't want to move, you just take a card from the ground. Then one button should be enough: "Take a card from the ground", which gives the turn to the other player. Or what?
So, what if the opponent also takes a card from the ground and gives the turn back? Then you can take as many cards from the ground as you have on the ground without making a move first?
jaanusVint.ee创建者 2009-01-24T15:06:13+02:00
Yes. It's up to the players to decide whether they want to end the game and declare a winner or try to set a record for the longest game. The game doesn't end anyway.
odin 2009-01-27T17:53:58+02:00
The Russians play the game of "ertu kunn" - put whatever you want on it, but here, unfortunately, mast or kunn?!
kivipea 2009-01-27T18:34:34+02:00
The current rules are the most honest - in that there must be a bluff - then the game is fairer and also gives you an idea of what cards the other person has and what they don't have - otherwise the game would turn into a very poker-like game of chance!

发表回复

这个功能只针对已验证的或VIP用户