-100 points for 1000 interruptions in the game

If a user blocks the table from X during a game in a thousand tournament, that user should receive -100 points in the tournament leaderboard for that round. This should not apply to online stations when the clock is ticking to zero or when a VIP has the computer playing for them. Who is in favor?

I agree to interrupt then.

Totally agree. Others are not to blame for one player's scumbag behavior.

I support it. And then we could also create a system so that those with a rating below 1000 points - that is, constant interrupters and fools like undu and some others - would no longer be able to participate in tournaments for, for example, a week. You can't just get a rating below 1000, you have to play fools consistently. And let's do that somewhere else!

What are we talking about here? 1) Aborting a game in a game room? 2) Aborting a game in a tournament? 3) Aborting a tournament?

Aborting a game in a tournament

I don't really agree with that, here non-VIP players get an advantage. They might just be running out of time. It would be easier for VO to prohibit closing Xist and let the non-VIP computer play the given session to the end. However, if the second timeout occurs, the non-VIP tournament would automatically end. This would prevent a situation where you accidentally put two tournaments on the wrong window, closing Xist for a good game.

I agree with all solutions that would help people like Alqa stop the piggybacking.

iksist sulgemist ei tohi keelata

This is where Meikop could speak...in my opinion, finishing is a tactical move...all sorts of dirty tricks are done in chess...so I would be screwed, and my game would be riddled with cunning dirty tricks.