New Design in Tournaments
Read by 103 users
It's not difficult at all. 😀 If the arrow is at the end, you can see that the tournament is open. If there is no arrow, then you can't YET!
The time is more important than the date, it should either be in a different size or be more emphasized (e.g. bold).
I also agree with the swamp palm....
My point: if the tournament room is not open, the arrow is gray, if the tournament room is open, the arrow is red.
and that would be the norm if there are enough players in the tournament room (for the tournament to take place) then the arrow is ntx golden. a yeah, that doesn't really make sense, although it would be good
and that would be the norm if there are enough players in the tournament room (for the tournament to take place) then the arrow is ntx golden. a yeah, that doesn't really make sense, although it would be good
I liked the one with the window better.
I also liked the previous one more.
I have another topic to discuss:
Would something be very wrong if players were not removed from the player list at the beginning of the round?
There is currently a problem with this: For example, the tournament organizer cannot remove a user from the tournament until their game is over and the user is visible in the player list again.
Even regular users have a problem - for example, they would like to start a private chat but can't - they have to wait for the game to end or have to go to the large hall to look for the user.
Removing a user from the list is a historical decision - back when we only had chess/checkers. Back then, it seemed logical that if a user was playing, they shouldn't be able to be invited to play, and then they shouldn't be on the list either.
Thoughts?
Would something be very wrong if players were not removed from the player list at the beginning of the round?
There is currently a problem with this: For example, the tournament organizer cannot remove a user from the tournament until their game is over and the user is visible in the player list again.
Even regular users have a problem - for example, they would like to start a private chat but can't - they have to wait for the game to end or have to go to the large hall to look for the user.
Removing a user from the list is a historical decision - back when we only had chess/checkers. Back then, it seemed logical that if a user was playing, they shouldn't be able to be invited to play, and then they shouldn't be on the list either.
Thoughts?
Very confusing wording from Meikop, but a player who goes to a tournament or participates in it should not of course "disappear" from the list of players in their regular rooms. A simple thing would save the day: if they participate in a tournament, this ban sign will automatically appear in front of them (in other game rooms) so that they cannot be invited to other games at the same time or interfered with. At least until the system makes it very difficult to play several games/tournaments at once. Another option is that each player decides for themselves whether to put a ban sign in front of themselves in other rooms - either they don't want to be disturbed at all or they just don't want challenges, but in general they shouldn't be able to chat during tournament games. I still haven't understood why those who go to tournaments are removed from the list of regular game rooms.
Tournament participants will not be removed from the regular game room list!
They will only be removed from the player list for the duration of the game in that same tournament room!
And that's what I'm talking about - maybe I shouldn't.
They will only be removed from the player list for the duration of the game in that same tournament room!
And that's what I'm talking about - maybe I shouldn't.
If not, what does it give?