User verification on the Vint.ee portal
Lu par 415 utilisateurs
I wanted to comment (I thought a public figure could do it secretly) and bought the Elu24 article, but it turned out that in order to comment I had to prove my identity with an ID card or some other means, so you can only get killed for money, you idiot.
A completely inappropriate and off-topic thought, just like 90% of Metsa's comments!
YES, it is!
All sorts of thoughts, but you could also throw in a description of the final outcome here so it's clear what and how.
It's like corona, those of us who have the checkmark have received our passports :D
I posted one update:
Only other verified users can see people's real names on their profiles.
So - if you want to see other people's names, you have to reveal your own name.
I will be making a similar change to the user search and tournament tables in the near future!
Only other verified users can see people's real names on their profiles.
So - if you want to see other people's names, you have to reveal your own name.
I will be making a similar change to the user search and tournament tables in the near future!
The fastest ones have already created their own database based on Vint's data.
Verification is of course good, then child protection and social workers can see whether the candidate for mother of the year or father of the year and their children are getting cards here and buying VIP status with child benefits.
To Meikop. Better half an egg than an empty shell! My suggestion to the vint.ee team was a little different (in a private chat), but that's it. Showing your real name should actually be voluntary, and a verified user could still get the right to know who they're playing with in some official games, so why not just ask the vint.ee team. At the same time, there shouldn't be a way to link pseudonyms to real names. The solution is simple: if you play under your real name, your username won't be visible, and if you play with a pseudonym, your real name won't be visible. Even in the deep Soviet era, creative people could write under pseudonyms, without disclosing it; of course, the KGB and the paymasters knew...
I would still like to ask you to take into account the wishes of many users here: and to think about why my proposal was also supported by many VIP and verified users.
I emphasize once again that I am not against verification, but I'm angry at how this was done so carelessly!
There have been plenty of reasonable suggestions here on how to identify a person using modern methods, such as smart-ID, digital signature, etc. And I don't understand the logic behind the fact that if you have officially made a bank transfer under your name and used the same name in your email address when registering, you cannot be identified!
I would still like to ask you to take into account the wishes of many users here: and to think about why my proposal was also supported by many VIP and verified users.
I emphasize once again that I am not against verification, but I'm angry at how this was done so carelessly!
There have been plenty of reasonable suggestions here on how to identify a person using modern methods, such as smart-ID, digital signature, etc. And I don't understand the logic behind the fact that if you have officially made a bank transfer under your name and used the same name in your email address when registering, you cannot be identified!
If the man's passwords, ID card, and passport are in the woman's hands, then he can verify himself as a man in all options (including Meikop's), while if the woman's passwords are in the man's hands, then you can verify yourself as a woman.