Estonia's best card player 2016
318 ユーザーによる読み取り
How does the guy feel about double accounts? Will the first one be deleted if I get the same rating with a double account? Because there was a story somewhere that if two accounts are discovered on one player from the front row, one will be deleted or something? And it would still be more interesting if there was a so-called, "regging" to some table where records would be kept, but that's it.
that one game played and in the top ten?? DOES THAT MEAN THAT HE PLAYED WITH THE BLUES AND HE WAS THE GREY AND WON??? do I understand correctly that the rating doesn't matter that it does more harm than good..??? there should be some kind of selection buttons that I'm playing the competition game and that now I'm playing the same way when I come home from work in the evening and my brain is tired and why shouldn't everyone start at 1400 for the competition so that when the competition is over we can continue where we left off and we don't have any control over your table. there wouldn't be any need to do interim summaries so often etc. if everyone starts at 1400 it's right and everyone has a nice overview of how the best card reader of 2016 will be born.
Those who play tournament games should not be able to choose the rating difference, when a table is created, everyone should have the opportunity to play there and the table creator should not be able to refuse, who to allow or not, otherwise it is not fair at all. Those who are in favor of a separate regaming for such a tournament with a starting rating. I would do some kind of survey between some shades
I think the best is not the one with the HIGHEST rating at the end, but the one whose rating INCREASES the most.
Well then you have to look for the best player who has not been able to raise the rating otherwise, you have to look for the winner among the grays or at best among the greens and that will be the best,,,funny number...if you look for the winner like that. if everyone plays for 2 months and in the end the places are divided, then whoever wins, it shows absolutely nothing, it's just one place where you can get credit and the whole story I won't win anyway, but if you just play here and come out as the winner, I wouldn't dare accept the trophy even if I were to win, I would know that I'm not the best, or at best I'll fit into the top 20..the right thing is that we start with all 1400 and the first 30 games that have been played in all the different card games that are in the competition will count and then everyone will get their raids back and we'll continue from there...onwards
[i]posted by kamby[/i] well then you have to look for the best player who has not otherwise been able to raise the rating then you have to look for the winner among the greys or at best among the greens and that will be the best,,,funny number...if you look for the winner like that. if everyone plays for 2 months and in the end places are divided then whoever wins it shows absolutely nothing it is just one place where you can get credit and the whole story I won't win anyway but if you just play here and come out as the winner then I wouldn't dare accept the trophy even if I were to win I would know that I am not the best or at best I will fit in the top 20..the right thing is that we start with all 1400 and the first 30 games that have been played in all the different card games that are in the competition will count and then everyone will get their raids back and we will continue from there...onwards
1
I haven't bothered to read this thing through here and I don't know what exactly they're arguing about, but one thing is for sure - I'm the best card player of 2016. The absolute ruler and king of the Bismarck space. The owner of the mega rating. I should be awarded the trophy and cash prize for the best player of 2016.
[i]posted by kamby[/i] and the first 30 games played in all the different card games that are in the competition count
Stating that the best card player comes out with 30 games played rather than 300 is obviously wrong. Card games are successful in the long term. And this level is shown by the vint.ee rating. Those who claim that the rating doesn't matter probably don't know how to play themselves. And if the rating shows the level, why not find out the best based on it? But okay, it seems that the interest in this competition is cool anyway. Let's leave it then, 2000 credits will not be distributed and there will be a lot of whining on the forum. Besides, the mental sports Olympiad will come right after - I'd rather try to get children to play checkers / chess than their parents' cards:) PS! Those who have read the first post, we also found a better solution to the initial problem than this competition would have been.
The rating really shows something and it is correct in card games. The more games, the better the rating should settle down. But unfortunately, the vint.ee rating cannot be taken seriously, because the richer users can manipulate the rating here. Namely, they have poor internet connection protection and others do not, which is why a better player can lose because the internet connection was interrupted for a while. And secondly, users can buy a rating to the original 1400, which also messes up the rating, because they start playing 1400 again because the actual level is maybe 1100 and he can do it repeatedly. If a sufficient number of users practice this, then it will also throw the rating a little off. The rating can really be calculated and the more games, the more accurately it shows, especially in card games where luck also has a share, but I would not trust the vint.ee rating too much.
It seems that the whole thing is about VIP status and what it takes... Every tournament is regatta and everyone is equally at zero, whether it's a rating or whatever. In any case, if by some miracle such an event were to take place, then Juba under the name Vindi parim, not Estonian-Parimad, would definitely not waste time on such a thing with such conditions. As for whining, isn't the forum for expressing your opinions? Why do anything at all if one person orders, hangs and lets go. Personal opinion and does not speak for others!!