Great Sasku Tournament Series
Read by 57 users
Regarding the calculation of points percentages, the more participants the further behind you can be to get a better percentage, if you have fewer participants and are ahead, let's be honest, this system is nonsense. For example, if you are sixth in one tournament and tenth in another, there is a chance that you will get a better percentage when you are tenth. And that's how it is. Why not have a points system where you add up the points for the place and get 15-20 points, or how many participants were needed for the tournament to take place.
10th place in a tournament with 50 participants is a better result than 6th place in a tournament with 15 participants.
I have no complaints about the scoring system, but is there a current ranking somewhere?
Saskuruumi all on link
the link is there, but it won't open
[i]posted by Meikop[/i] 10th place in a tournament with 50 participants is a better result than 6th place in a tournament with 15 participants.
This is understandable with the system here, but is it fair? It can't be compared to other sports, but it would be really funny if the same injection was given to the same person, for example. In skiing or cross-country skiing, they distribute the points so that before the competition it is worth knowing how many opponents there are, whether it is worth participating or not. And that is why there are fewer participants before the end, as there were in the Ton series. It is good that no lessons were learned from that. In fact, it concerns those who, for example, cannot participate in all of them at the beginning, and again we come to this vip issue. At least the tournament series could be free, but where do you still earn it? I was just thinking to myself, if it seems ugly and nonsense, then you can delete the post.