Sasku's failure to attend the tournament

16:05.11] Nurme: well what...alko? [16:05.24] AlQaholic: yolo [16:05.33] stam85 joined the tournament room! [16:05.39] Nurme: why didn't you play to the end? [16:05.44] stam85 left the game room. [16:05.45] AlQaholic: because of the bull [16:05.45] AlQaholic: irw [16:05.49] Nurme: especially annoying [16:05.54] AlQaholic: ok So a longer conversation developed on the forum that there is nothing to be done with those who don't go when it suits them. How to tell if the connection was lost or the person doesn't go at a time that is not convenient for them... What to do with those who don't go and annoy them? As if he really wants some kind of punishment to follow...e.g. they get minus points or something like that, a good solution. Currently Alko himself admits that he does it for fun, but sometimes the net rarely goes away. Maybe a 10-day ban from tournaments would be too harsh, but...maybe some people will come to their senses.

It's not that bad, because things like people walking out of tournaments or skipping a few rounds happen in live events too... The point system should probably be improved a bit. I don't know exactly how the system works now, if you play a few rounds, you skip and come back (as a VIP of course). I guess there's nothing else to it than losing in place and rating, but what's important is how you compare to others! The worst thing is when, like in the middle of a hand, you deliberately walk ahead so that your opponent(s) don't get a good score! Yesterday, there was one thing in Bismarck that personally made me a little angry: The 7th round of the tournament (03.04.2016 22:00 - 03.04.2016 22:46)! I got a zero in my position with a score of 2! And because the game was left unfinished or abandoned at two tables and the same position at those tables. 60 points! And I believe that such things happen in other tournaments as well. 1 on 1 is easy, the same in chess, checkers, etc. tournaments. Those who are away get zero.

What conversation is this copied from? I don't remember such a thing... But if we go to the topic, I definitely wouldn't do such a thing for the sake of a bull. I remember a situation a few days ago: I'm leading with 70-something points before the last round, in the last round my partner makes a 4-square (0 flush) and a certain loss and second place looms ahead. I understand that there are a lot of people who would just accept this loss and move on, but if I specifically have the choice to leave the table and win the tournament despite my partner's mistake (or intentionality), then you know my choice.

Alko, this is an absolutely real conversation that I copied. http://www.vint.ee/turniiritabel/?id=67761 1st game Specifically, you left the last move of the game without making it. And then you sneered that "everyone does it like that!". We would have been in a hurry to square and you simply left the last move without making it. It's not about the points, it was and is about your attitude. That's not how it's done and we also talked about it in the forum of this same game. It's possible that this is normal, but in my opinion, such behavior should be accompanied by a punishment.

Don't overdramatize the matter - dropping your feces on the holy fatherland is also a crime, but who would leave their feces on the mushroom picking and bring it home :)

I'm not a troublemaker, but I'd like to see blood :D:D

In a ton of tournaments, without real copy though..I crawled and Alqa got mad at a third person for putting an ace in during the crawl (not right) and I had a real chance to play a good out (135 I guess). Alqa then wrote that I wouldn't give a damn about the bog (of course I got 0) and interrupted.. so I got 60 instead of 100.... So what to do? We should just publicly shame such JOKK - men!! I already mentioned in the chat that we should give out a title: the most pig tournament player or something :D

Forest, should this be tolerated then? Maybe indeed. So much about mushroom picking that the macaws won't dare to go to the forest anymore soon, because it's not a safe zone. Unexpected things can happen there and the internet may not spread either. When someone makes their trouble in the forest and buries it under the grass, it doesn't do anything to nature or to the next forest visitor.

If you follow the rules with your finger, I think it belongs in the topic: "report a rude user". And if a couple of dozen people have encountered such a thing, then the matter should be raised as a separate topic or even on a personal basis and we will collect the necessary votes together - you just have to refer to the chat in the case of a specific situation, to go to the forum and give your half-vote. I still came here to enjoy the game, but if 1 is still being playfully brutally rude (it's my business if I don't know how) towards other players, then something needs to be done, for a specific way of playing. So, Alqa - watch out! If you keep doing this, we will start collecting signatures! :)

I have a different understanding of rudeness than the bog palm. In my opinion, losing in time or giving a surrender win is not rude at all. Winning and losing are part of the game. There are several options to solve this problem: 1. Give 0-75 or 0-67 for surrender wins in card games instead of the current 0-60. 2. Do not show the tournament leaderboard to the user during the tournament (a similar situation exists in real card tournaments). The user knows his exact result, but not his place. In fact, the current tournament leaderboard is quite confusing anyway and needs to be made more clear.