Bismarck rating reform
Read by 119 users
Any update is welcome :D
All successful portals have one common factor in common: they are the face of the users. Such decisions change the face of the portal's leading figure. Users need to be talked to, their opinions listened to, and analyzed. This commentary and these five opinions don't stand up to criticism enough to make big changes. But hey, the main thing is that the owner is happy.
Those who had something to say have said it. There's no point in waiting here for months..it's time to start making decisions :D
If you can't be first, you can still be first.
oh..already decided, didn't know
[i]posted by IlonaJ[/i] if you can't be the first, then you can still be
I didn't understand the reply, who wants to be the first? Meikop? Not very believable, he's not that kind of character. The ratings were already strange for this game at the beginning, Next, it would be necessary to think that not only VIPs could start or create games, there would be significantly more players
Those who are not VIPs could also be allowed to make a table, but with a limit, for example: two tables in 24 hours, but VIPs have no limit. Otherwise, if the rating limit comes, there will definitely be few VIPs among the weaker players, and if the weaker players can rarely play, they will also lose interest in the game.
I propose a new RATING REFORM (no joke). Points should be distributed as follows: 1. First place takes points from second place. 2. First place takes points from third place. 3. Second place takes points from third place. The rating system is exactly the same as when playing one against one, only, it can be multiplied by 50 percent. The current system offers the following option, for example: 2900, 1800 and 700 play together. Rating 1800 can win games indefinitely, if 700 is last, 1800 does not get additional points. If I still constantly beat a player 1000 points stronger than me, then I also want to be rewarded for it, regardless of who the third person is at our table.
I'll say it bluntly that this rating system is nonsense.
[i]posted by verywell[/i] I propose a new RATING REFORM (no joke). Points should be distributed as follows: 1. First place takes points from second place. 2. First place takes points from third place. 3. Second place takes points from third place. The rating system is exactly the same as when playing one against one, only, it can be multiplied by 50 percent. The current system offers the following option, for example: 2900, 1800 and 700 play together. Rating 1800 can win games indefinitely, if 700 is last, 1800 does not get additional points. If I still constantly beat a player 1000 points better than me, then I also want to be rewarded for it, regardless of who the third person is at our table.
This idea has merit. And just multiplying l2bi by 0.5 (otherwise the loss of 3rd place will be too r2nk). I'll do 2ra by tomorrow, let's try.