Variation games and their rating

Variations of the basic games such as gomoku pente, chess three lights and pickling, which are not very popular, should not be included in the same rating as the common game. As a solution, playing these games could either not change the rating at all or be included in a separate rating calculation. This would make it harder to collect a high rating without knowing the game itself. After all, the rating is supposed to show the player's level? Maybe the rating is not important enough to make any changes? It is sad to see how some players cruelly exploit the situation. I am talking about the user Ants, who is the victim in particular. As the leading figure of Estonian renjúle, he accepts all game invitations out of a sense of mission, which is why he often loses a lot of rating due to playing pente. Pente is very similar to renjúle and gomoku. Maybe Ants is not bothered by this at all, but the effect of the low rating is still there. Ants has introduced vinti to many children from several schools, some of whom also attend renjúle training. Children often judge a player's strength by their rating and cannot adequately evaluate their coach due to the inappropriate rating system. Point - The Playok board joining system is much better, you can try to be original and do nothing like it has been done before, but is there still a point in using a worse system? The two systems mentioned both have the same functions, but you also have to take into account the psychologist. In Sudoku, it could become impossible to call a very difficult puzzle with a 3-minute time control, which is essentially a variation.

If he doesn't know how to play the game, then he doesn't have to play it. And if he wants to play it, he can play without counting points. That way he doesn't lose points...

I am aware of these options, my opinion does not change.

Well... it could be that these games take place in the same room but the rating is different. E.g. rendzul and gomoku. But then again the question arises how to show the rating without getting in the way of too many things. If again you make separate rooms for all games, e.g. chess you don't bother going to separate rooms to play regular chess and three lights you want them to be in the same room. Or you open two windows at once to look at the chess room and the three lights room but you also don't bother to look all the time who is there and then start messing with them. If you are playing chess and you are running out of seconds like your opponent, you suddenly get a message e.g. user Raadio (a completely arbitrary name) invites you to play three lights. It starts to distract you and at the same time time is running. You could then be in the same room but the ratings are different. There could be a bar under the user that shows the ratings in different colors. E.g. blue is chess, red is three lights and green would be pickling. This is, in my opinion, the only logical solution to such a topic, if it is so important. It could be otherwise, but I hope it won't interfere. If it did, I wouldn't be particularly in favor of it. Maybe someone else will have a better idea, but I don't see a better solution here.

The rating reform probably solved this problem.