-100 points for 1000 interruptions in the game

forest ....I still have a lot of things I don't understand, I'm still learning 1000 ....by the way, I don't leave anyone unfinished and block anyone.......but I'm slowly starting to understand some of the tricks.

It has happened 2 times that I pressed the wrong button.

Mets58. Stop spouting your nonsense about some kind of collusion. First. Figaro already answered that he himself was wrong. Second, I am not to blame if someone is cowardly, makes a mistake or someone is messing up and Alqa suffers losses and then punishes me (the third player) as an innocent person with his scheming - by closing the table. What am I to blame for and I have to settle for 70 points instead of 100??? Alqa has a so-called 0, let him be an honorable and respectable man and respect other players and play the round to the end!!! If he is so busy that he supposedly needs to deal with other things and save his time, then there is no need to register for the tournament and take part in the game!!! Third. If there was some collusion with Figaro, do you really think Mets that I would make a fuss??? In the case of collusion, I would be silent but not make a fuss. It's worth thinking before spouting nonsense, and you also know very well that a year ago Alqa practiced the same behavior on Rabapalm! Both Raba and Alqa have said this and admitted it. For some reason, only Alqa causes such messes, but no one else. The reason is simple - others respect their fellow players, but Alqa absolutely does not and whistles at ethics and unwritten rules. He simply spits in the face of others by figuratively saying so. Ultimately, you know very well that Alqa has a habit of being a pig and leaving tournaments unfinished, etc. And many know this, it's no secret. So before barking up the wrong tree, you should think and not make a fool of yourself. And fourthly, it's time for Alqa and those justifying his actions to start understanding that indirectly his actions are also damaging the reputation of the guy and he could be punished based on this clause alone. The fact that we are forced to make some changes to a popular game because of one person's scheming, which may upset the good balance of the game and reduce its popularity, is already causing damage and thereby damaging the reputation of the game. I can say, based on my long experience and referring to several sites, that Alqa's actions may at one point lead to people giving up participating in a thousand tournaments and the most popular tournament in the game may simply fade away, and that because of one scheming person. All things are interconnected and it is worth understanding that everything has its own consequences and Alqa in particular should start to understand what he is doing with his actions and stop admiring himself and not considering others, you also need to look around and think about the consequences! I recommend that you, Mets, start to understand the same.

Lauri wanted to get undeserved 100 points from a mistake by a beginner (Figaro) and AlQaholic prevented this with a game technique allowed by the rules (closing the table) - as a result, he himself got 0 points and Lauri got 70 points. It was a tense moment of struggle. I have played in tournaments where Meikop leaves the tournament unfinished or closes the table - all these things are allowed. Is Lauri now also demanding a boycott of tournaments where Meikop participates.

I have closed a table by mistake. I played Bismark (or was it nails) and a thousand tournament at the same time. Between different moves, I had to move to different tabs. Then I wanted to close the already finished table, but accidentally closed the tab in which my thousand game was running. When I closed a tab, at least there was no error message before. Has this changed now?

A separate confirmation window will only appear for a running game.

Lauri3885 is already demanding that 100 rating points be deducted from the player for every table closure. Tomorrow, he may be demanding that he be fired.

Klemets. Have you really gone crazy? Where did I demand anything??? I made a proposal and explained the point of the matter. If you can't even tell the difference between a proposal and a demand anymore, then sorry, there's nothing more to talk about with you. And the reasons you gave at the tournament table were simply at the level of a kindergarten child. I also said something about responsible play, attitude and respect for other players, you seem to have completely forgotten that. And to talk about some kind of shooting, it seems to me that you have lost every last bit of sense. There is nothing more intelligent to discuss with you and Kirjatsura if you can't even understand basic things. To others. The basic thing is that your attitude is your own! If you see that you can't play the tournament to the end, don't sign up for the tournament! If you are in a hurry and there is a risk that you will have to leave the tournament halfway, then again, don't sign up for the tournament, even out of respect for other players! And everyone experiences network outages, and Meikop clearly said that they are not being poked. We are talking about intentional outages, and here it is quite clearly identifiable because for some reason it is a habit of certain players to do this all the time, I won't name names, everyone knows who these players are, others for some reason don't have such constant problems with leaving games/tournaments unfinished. And these players should be punished, and if we add to that the deduction of rating points for each round that was intentionally left unplayed and a limit of 1100 was imposed on tournaments, then next time a player with a rating of 1400 and leaves the tournament unfinished in the 7th round would get -500 rating points for last place instead of the usual -250, and at the end of the tournament the rating would be 900 points, there would be problems with getting into the next tournament if the limit is 1100 for the next tournament. The purpose of this would be to make players think about whether it is worth leaving the tournament unfinished if they don't get into the next tournament. In addition, it makes you think in advance whether it is still worth playing the tournament if you cannot play the tournament normally to the end. The 1100 limit is completely reasonable because no normal player who plays the tournament properly to the end responsibly, does not fool around, etc. will simply fall below this rating! I have been playing the tournament for half a year and have never fallen below this limit. If this really happened to someone by accident, there is always a chance to raise their rating at the table and come to the tournament again. Rabapalm already put a 1100 limit on his tournaments and I plan to do the same with my new tournaments. It is time to understand that any player's unexpected departure from the tournament immediately affects other game tables and has even led to the tournament being abandoned! Raba has repeatedly explained this to many people and I have long understood where the point is in the point system with a player leaving the tournament. It is time for others to understand this too. In addition, abandoning the tournament shows a lack of respect for fellow players! Perhaps these measures would instill a sense of responsibility and respect for other players in certain players. Just as in real life, we must behave responsibly in the virtual world!

The rating will drop anyway if you leave the tournament and end up at the bottom of the table. 1 round can also be interrupted accidentally, as probably all players have done. If you are against closing the table intentionally in a specific round, simply not allowing this option would help. It's just a matter of wasting time. A topic about makeup. I would suggest an option where you can't close the table and if a player doesn't make a move, the computer will do it for them, but quickly (not 30 seconds) and regardless of VIP status. In this case, it wouldn't take long and it would be fair to all players, because there would no longer be "0" in the comparison of trick points when comparing positions at different tables.

I tend to agree with the bog palm's solution. Unfortunately, Mr. Lauri simply can't see beyond the end of his nose, and lacks the basic ability to look at things from different perspectives.