Proposal: No hair with a village over there

/my husband still goes to play saskut with his classmates 1-2 times a year and believe me, they all play like that. They have been playing for years. The classmates live all over Estonia and hairy IS hairy!/ Is that objective? :p In one group, one society, one family, the same rules and beliefs are usually traditionally followed, but it is certainly not objective or as objective as the one-party system. I never said that people don't play like that - they do play and even more so, but in this calculation it still originates from a game of overkill, where brains are less needed, only brawn counts! Let's try to objectively analyze the variant in which case 1 pair "accidentally" makes the opponents hairy... Two should probably have 3 kings ( then three other pictures), three aces (in the extreme case 2 and "real aces" on the hitter) and at least 3 small squares (not pictures). These proportions could be slightly exaggerated, but if this "staff" is somehow divided into two, even as equally as possible, then over 90% of the time 1 should still bid at least 5!! If they bid, then they either don't bother or they waste a resource that is not worth the maximum bet. I don't need the help of "big brother", because I have personally played all the variants and I know what I'm talking about! I don't need the help of either my husband or his brothers in law; father, grandfather(s), mother(s), of course I remember them with a kind word, because this little bit of the game and knowledge originally came from them. I would say that there is a big difference between a hairy and a hairy one!! Taking all the tricks with a hard card and a perfect flush run is nothing special (just a joke, right?), but leaving your opponents to zero with a beautifully played and only possible correct moves is a strawberry, which is worth playing for!

The rule that the furry ends the game immediately should be restored here - then the games will be much more interesting (they try to avoid getting furry at all costs.

Golden calf hair

Raba, I'm not exactly from the same childhood as my husband, but we still had our own lives and we didn't know each other before we met. His classmates are from all over Estonia and in their company (at one time there were tournaments at the university) neither overtaking nor overtaking without hair was played. Still with a loss of a suit and with hair at all times. Raba, this talk of objectivity. It doesn't really match the content :) To think about what could be objective in this case and what is subjective. There can be no complete objectivity when it comes to people's opinions.

I don't know anything about the old-time sasku tournaments. My classmates are all over Estonia, but when we get together we still play the way we once found a compromise, but no one can say that this is the only correct way and that this is how it has always been played everywhere, etc. As I understand it, even now, clubs play a fair amount of sasku according to tournament principles, but the rules are not the same. If we start throwing clichés (hairy is hairy), then, for example, in 1984, in addition to the agreed rules of the game, we also had 10 rules of game strategy in popular terms, but which characterized well how to play to achieve a good result. I would give one example: the third hand puts the crutch in the bucket :D, who understands, who doesn't, is wrong... The principles of the sasku game outlined by Meikop are more or less correct, but you always have to take into account exceptions, even more so with even-handed players, and if necessary, adjust the understanding according to the situation. There would be no point in arguing about the content of the concept of objectivity here, but simply saying-/ It is important that a furry IS furry. Really./- is still very far from impartiality. I justified above In essence, why in my opinion a furry Just is not furry, you have it justified only by the fact that it is so, because 1 group has constantly said it. Ok, then I propose an option here for our tournament system, that there is still a difference whether a furry comes with an overküla or with a made square. And from you, Nurme, I would ask for a reason why a bunny in an overküla does not count, what do you think are the reasons behind such a rule and why, against this background, a furry should count!?

Marsh, I can't keep up with your train of thought. These thoughts are too flighty. Honestly. If you look at the current so-called voting, it's not a matter of 1-2 votes, the majority also thinks that a hairy person is a hairy person. Well, if you can draw any conclusions at all with such a sample.

So what are we talking about, what flighty... I just reasoned that not every furry is furry! Let's play with the drawn trump card and leave out the offers, I wonder how many supporters this proposal will get!

Marsh, you can see that this last suggestion is funny. I can't bear to say more :)

Since there is no international organization for sasku, nor even an Estonian sasku union, nor uniform rules, MegaJopski and I will base our decision on Wikipedia :) / The over-the-hill square gives a total of 2 dashes to the pair that has the most points. You don't get extra dashes for a stuck and a hairy one. / For clarification, let alone a point total of 16. It should also be noted in disputes whether we are talking about a tournament or a regular game. By the way, there was 1 tournament, -too bad I didn't mention it-, where different points were awarded for a hairy one! It could have been something like this: 1 pair made a hairy one with their square, but were outplayed on the other board with either a suit or a square... In the tournament version, it is generally the case that over-the-hill square is no longer left out for fun, let alone a hairy one -so there would be no need for disputes...

Bog, anyone can edit Wikipedia. It's not the kind of source you'd want to cite. Universities don't take this source very seriously.